No Joke: Katten Represents Couple in Suit Claiming Friars Club Failed to Deliver Oscar Tix It Auctioned

March 5, 2012 6:41 PM

No Joke: Katten Represents Couple in Suit Claiming Friars Club Failed to Deliver Oscar Tix It Auctioned

Posted by Sara Randazzo

The 2012 Billy Crystal–hosted Academy Awards may have been a snooze for viewers at home, but two disgruntled New Yorkers are apparently quite disappointed they couldn’t be on hand for the festivities—and say the charitable arm of the Friars Club is to blame.

In a suit filed in New York state court Friday by attorneys with Katten Muchin Rosenman, Michael and Patricia Franzino claim The Friars Foundation and Grandstand Sports Memorabilia auctioned off Oscar tickets that the two organizations didn’t, it turns out, actually own and never provided.

The couple bought an Oscar package, which included a trip to Los Angeles and tickets to the February 26 awards show, during an auction at the Intrepid Sea, Air Space Museum last June, according to their lawyer, Katten partner Steven Eckhaus. As the months wore on, however, the Oscar tickets never materialized, according to the couple’s three-page summons (PDF).

The ordeal caused the Franzinos to “incur cost, acute embarrassment, and professional ridicule,” the summons contends.

Howard Schwartz, the president and founder of New York–based Grandstand Sports, said in an e-mail that the couple were reimbursed the $27,000 they paid for the package—and have already cashed the check— and were still offered the first-class roundtrip airfare and luxury hotel stay “as a courtesy.” A Friars Club spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Eckhaus, who chairs Katten’s executive employment practice, says the Franzinos didn’t go on the trip to Los Angeles. Asked why they are still seeking legal redress, Eckhaus asked, “If you were told a week before the Oscars you wouldn’t be able to go, how would you feel?”

The Franzinos seek more than $250,000 in damages, which the summons describes as relief for the “fraud, gross negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and breach of contract” they were subjecte to by the defendants.

Make a comment

Comments (0)
Save Share: Facebook
Del.ic.ious

| Email

Reprints Permissions

Comments

Report offensive comments to The Am Law Daily.


ERROR: 8 - CURL error: Couldn't resolve host 'liongroup.infusionsoft.com'